SUE = HER!

Say what you will, 

this dame has got guts alright! 

Must be tons of fun 

talking literature, Tinseltown 

and the tumultuous, oddball 

storied love affair between the two 

over the decades...!!! 

Happy B-Day, 

Sue! 

Kitty Kat Got Told... No

Can you own a shape? Kit Kat loses its 16-year battle to trademark a four-fingered wafer bar at top EU court https://t.co/CI8XIU4wxz

— BBC Breaking News (@BBCBreaking) July 25, 2018

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

HAHAHAHA

HAHAHA

HAHA

HA

SUE *THEM* - SOMEBODY!

YEAH! 

SOMEBODY SHOULD SUE THESE PEEPS 

- A.S.A.P. 

SUE THAT A$$ - FOR BEING TOO SHAPELY! 

SUE THIS ONE ALREADY - FOR BLASPHEMY!!! 

SAME FOR THIS ONE!!! 

SUE THESE GUYS FOR 

MISREPRESENTATION 

FALSIFICATION 

AND OUTRIGHT IGNORANCE!!! 

SUE THE MORONS WHO WILL 

TRY AND MERCHANDISE 

ANYTHING... ANYONE... AT ANY GIVEN TIME!!! 

JUST DO IT! 

JUSTICE CAN STILL BE SERVED! 

Well... SOMEBODY Wants To Sue... Taber?!?

It's not Taber's Truths now - is it? Cannot be!!! 

Of course, it is not T T ...!

Some surprisingly conservative turn 

(even for Canada) 

on the part of legislators up north 

has placed the town of 

Taber, Alberta, Canada 

on the map, all of a sudden...

And that has subsequently led the kids there 

to call upon good ol' Kevin Bacon -of all people- 

to save their... ah... bacon? 

As if Kev was some sort of Obi-Wan of profanity...! 

The situation in Taber mirrors quite strangely 

the retrograde climate that made up the entire scenario 

of that unlikely sleeper hit flick, Footloose, it is true... 

But to imagine that an over-the-hill actor 

can help in any way...

Is it a worthy cause, anyway? 

''Defend the right to swear in public'' - eh? 

No - it is not necessary! 

For it is not a question of free speech at all: 

more like a question of decency! 

It should be obvious to all media 

wasting time reporting this trivial bit of news

(as it is to me who is blogging about it!)

And not Bacon nor all the twists and turns 

his (pedi?) degrees can take 

will help those pesky brats up north now...!

THE CURFEW IS ON!

Should Have Sued... Sinatra!!!

Post by Frank Sinatra.

.
The chairman of the board...!  

(Or was it the ''bored''?  

For, I wonder still,  

which ''board'' was it, 

exactly...?)

Wasn't he always, like, taunting and goading us into doing just that anyway: "it's UP to YOU" he said - aaall the time - rrrrrright?!?

Aye, suing Frank for a variety of things would have been just the right thing to do alright: what, with the possible millions it would have raked in, what wonders we could have done with that, hmm?

Suing him for having wrought upon the world song after song that was only, in truth, but humming, rambling and mumbling, not singing. Suing him for this very song right here: about a town that is nothing more than a crime-infested rotten-to-the-core ''APPLE'' - the kind you really do NOT want to sink your teeth into - EVER. And he sang of it as if it was the greatest place to be on God's Green Earth - HA!!!

Suing him for having begotten Jr. there... (then again, we are much obliged for Ol' Blue Eyes having given us Nancy - though she waited far too long to do that Playboy spread there...! We love MILFs and GILFs but... Geez! There's a limit, woman! Some decency - please! At your age... Why couldn't you have succumbed and done it when you were sipping that Summer Wine instead - HUH? NOW... Sheesh! Leave it to our imagination and for your bedroom - and whoever you're sharing it with! But that's another story - not necessarily to sue for...!)

Finally, we should have sued Frank for those Rat Pack shenanigans, what he did to Peter Lawford afterwards and that insufferable arrogance of his... But his mob buds would have prevented us from suing, so...

I should sue...

A WHOLE LOT OF ASSHOLES! 

Like the morons who thought it made sense
to change a whole lot of two-way streets
(which have been this way for years - years!)
into one-way streets... like, overnight!?
Well, it sure as hell felt like it was overnight to ME;
what am I supposed to do here - keep a breast of all
that those lousy, good-for-nothing elected officials
are planning as totally unnecessary changes
to the urban landscape that I have known that way
and am still getting used to - that way -
while I am toiling hard here so hard yeah 
for every last virtual penny that is coming
my way - or towards the trusty ol' bank account...!

I swear ya, I swear ya...
I'm feeling like David Wilcox here!

Or -outright- like Rodney. 

Okay - sue the YouTube uploader there; 

we want more than just the catch phrase here! 

And we shall have it:  

... which brings us to the next 

(sore) subject/category of 

morons to sue... 

Anyone who ever disrespected ME - 

yeah you... blabbermouth JERK! 

You know who you are...! 

Or, rather, you only think that you do... 

You dared to make fun of me... eh? 

You laughed at me... 

actually made fun of me!?

HUH? 

Well look at you now... 

A has-been... still a wannabee... 

Or worse still: an ever-so ephemeral, 

blink-and-you-miss-it 

flash-in-the-pan 

USED-TO-BE 

FOR ALL OF TWO SECONDS 

IN THE GRAND SCHEME OF THINGS! 

Bet you don't even know 

how to surf the web 

in order to find THIS...!!! 

which is GOOD, actually - see; 

that way, I have quite exactly zero chances of getting SUED 

(which would be quite the travesty of justice 

and revolting turn of events as it is...!!!) 

as I purposefully leave out your names... 

since I am doing it, you see, MY WAY...! 

Alas all this is still too damn close to the way I do it 

on my other blog; y'know... the LAMBASTING one! 

I am not about to leave me wide open to get sued 

by jerks/bastards/morons/nincompoops/neanderthals 

that have slighted me in the past - on top of that!!! 

We wanna get litigious? 

We do it the luminous way: we sue! 

We don't get sued!!! 

Although I am reticent to give any wad of cash 

to just about any pettifogger whatsoever - 

in order to get going there... 

But I digress... 

I should sue...

THE 13! 

Now to select which 

thirteen that truly is...

Reasons to sue vary wildly 

-there are, at least, thirteen- 

and whether "we got a case" 

(or thirteen cases - yeah) 

is not for sure at all... 

Just be glad I picked 

a Sunday the 13th 

(not Friday the 13th) 

to, ah, explore the possibilities 

and opportunities... here! 

You never want to say 

"I should have sued" 

after all... eh? 

I should sue...

SUPERSTITION! 

See - it causes all sorts of mischief 

AND 

it begat... all of the following: 

I'll take the 13th... 

it's for a gift! 

We Should Sue... Peggy Sue!

...for having failed so badly to truly live up 

to the great legacy... of Buddy!

Buddy Holly wouldn't have sued - I know. 

Can't believe Peggy Lee never did though!

Let's Sue... The Dirty Dozen!

We HATE the army, y'know... 

... not all that fond of workouts either... 

... THIS GUY alone deserves to be sued - 

for setting such a caloric-rich BAD example 

- for breakfast!!! 

... SEE??? 

Let's sue the Brass Band too, while we're at it - 

they're making too much noise!!! 

And the dozen clones (... DC's...!!!) 

from Seattle, too...!!!  

That should be enough work for 12 

pettifoggers from any dime-a-dozen law firm 

out there...!!! 

Yup! 

Sue YT - For Libel!

What could possibly be more compromising than having one of these videos amidst your perfectly lyrical, musical playlist courtesy of YouTube?

I mean - I don't know what is truly worse: this or that!
(And never mind when they do this to you!)

It just boggles the psyche - er, mind, that is - that they would put such messages in place, as if to incriminate the uploader AND viewers of whatever videos it may be...!

Granted - if you uploaded compromising pictures of yourself like, I don't know, say Tony of NY did, that would take the cake

I swear to you, those square-faced "sorry smileys" with their "embarrassed/we messed up" goofy look all over their smirks - I can't stand them anymore!!!

Having one of those show up is not only annoying and embarrassing indeed - it is a case of libel, I tell you. Because having these videos removed makes it seem that they were considerably worse than they are in truth - and it reflects terribly bad on you for having had them, once upon a time, as a part of your precious playlist!

I mean, the YT message clearly states that they took down the video because of their (self-sanctimonious) policy regarding nudity and/or sexual content - whoa! Peeps see this was part of your playlist, a perfectly innocent playlist (as it is lyrical, musical - fantasmagorical) and they will imagine the worst imagery possible, being unable to actually view the video any longer in order to actually judge for themselves what it really was all about, due to the simple fact that YouTube took it down already!

So, this looks bad - on you! - not on YouTube! (Even YouTube's flaws show up crystal and painfully clear here, as such reprehensible material was allowed to be uploaded onto their site in the first place - but that will be overlooked by the common viewer in five seconds flat, I tell ya!)

YouTube is thus an accessory to making people look down on you, label you a "perv" or some other really detrimental and derogatory thing - and that should make YT accountable for something... right?!?

Just saying...!

;-)

I... no, W(w)E should sue...

Ric Flair!

For *not* retiring!

At 61 years of age...!

Wooooooooooo...?!?

While his heir apparent and nearest true rival, the one who had apparently retired *him* by defeating Ric in a so-called retirement match, HAS RETIRED... at 40-something!!!

Of course, Ric has retired and unretired four or five times already in the last three decades - so doing this is not at all unlike him.

One guesses that, after being such a big spender with (is it four) previous wives, he still has a *Fourtune* to build... or rebuild.

It is he who should have sued, probably...!

Oh well...
Wooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

:!

Flair should have sued Turner!!!

Should We Sue... Numan?!?

Numan - not Newman!
You silly Seinfeldians...!
But let's not digress right off the bat here...

Here on the TLB Prime Network, everybody loves Todd! Todd Agnew, that is! (You did not think it was Todd MacFarlane - did you?!? And, yes, it is a reference to that other sitcom - which we consider to be far superior to ''Seinfeld'' - that freak show! ''Everybody Loves Raymond', was a 100 times better! Wanna sue us for that? Huh? HUH? Darn - we *are* getting digressed here... Or digressive? Rhymes with aggressive! Sue me, willya?!?)

Let's try again: everyone loves Todd here...
And everyone loves Jesus! Of course!
See - nothing but love...!

In fact we love that particular Toddster -Agnew- largely due to the following song: MY JESUS...

What a powerful song - the lyrics say it all and are, near the end, a veritable profession of faith and devotion - full of the questioning that is particular to the Christian, the true one that is... This song is a masterpiece, unquestionably. Every Christian should listen to it every once in a while; it will reinforce them. 

Now, it came as somewhat of a shock to one's system when the existence of ANOTHER SONG titled MY JESUS came to our attention - and its author was that old stand-by from the eighties, Gary Numan. Numan? Numan! (Yes - I have been inferring that you say it like Jerry Seinfeld used to say it, whenever he would run into his mock nemesis... Newman, of course... from the very start, here! You don't have a PROBLEM with that now; do ya? But let's move on - and go straight to the point!)

Numan's version of MY JESUS is all about what JESUS represents to him and people like him - and so he focuses not on the Divinity but on the pain that He suffered; the more material aspects of His Life; the surface value, basically... Clearly, this could be an attempt to nullify faith in the Son of God and only see the Son of Man in Him...

At first, I gave this the benefit of the doubt - on donne une chance au coureur, comme on dit quelque part en France, n'est-ce pas...! Despite all its obvious darker resonances, I thought it did bring one positive to the table: that he spoke of Jesus to crowds not used to it. And that was certainly very positive in and by itself - right?!? Of course, it is all in the way that you do it and in the way that these crowds receive it and perceive it...

How do *you* perceive this piece of music...?

Have a listen for yourselves now, with this extended version right here:

What do you say, people - was Numan inspired to do this out of professional jealousy? Or by something far darker than even that? I ask the question, plain and simple: was Gary Numan in fact an instrument of the devil here?!? His song seems to have an agenda: to strip of their faith anyone who sees past the crucifixion and death of the Christ and Believes in a Greater Meaning to it all - in His Resurrection, namely, and in The Salvation that He -and only He- Brings! It clearly sounds devil-inspired, both in the tangent that the lyrics take as in the dark, brooding interpretation of the song that Numan gives us. And in the overall sound of the song, for that matter! Hell, isn't that melody wicked or isn't it? Alas, we think it is! And, in so being, it is pretty much the antithesis of what Agnew did: and that, alas, is no good - no good at all!

Maybe a Christian coalition (not this one) should get a class action suit going here against this Numan guy - for fake or, outright, anti-preaching sub-text or something?!?  He should have stuck to Cars...!

Of course, if all he is doing is sharing with the world his warped view of what Jesus represents to him and only him - well, maybe we can still sue him for being such an idiot? Surely we can...! After all, he is being but a tool here - the devil's tool - and anyone who is that is but an abysmal fool! Let's not take too kindly to fools, shall we, now? Fools invite a beating, The Bible says! Hence, he's begging for one - in court! (Let,s do things lawfully or not at all, OK?) For Numan surely is one indeed; but a fool who has nothing to say about Jesus other than gibberish and surely that does not qualify as adequate proselytism?

While we are at this, we might as well have a closer second look at Personal Jesus too - Depeche Mode might have been less obviously *a tool* but we never know... Right?
Let's not miss a chance to sue some guilty party - any guilty party, to whatever degree - and at any given time or opportunity, folks!

Amen!
+++