The one and only legal advice I will ever dispense here:
NEVER MISS A CHANCE TO SUE THEM BASTARDS!
Hey - if they were dumb enough to leave themselves
wide open for it...!
Sempre Por O Melhor
+++
Tuesday, December 21, 2021
Order In The Court...! Session About To Resume...
The one and only legal advice I will ever dispense here:
NEVER MISS A CHANCE TO SUE THEM BASTARDS!
Hey - if they were dumb enough to leave themselves
wide open for it...!
Sempre Por O Melhor
+++
Saturday, April 25, 2020
SUE = HER!
Say what you will,
this dame has got guts alright!
Must be tons of fun
talking literature, Tinseltown
and the tumultuous, oddball
storied love affair between the two
over the decades...!!!
Happy B-Day,
Sue!
Saturday, November 2, 2019
Wednesday, July 25, 2018
Kitty Kat Got Told... No
Can you own a shape? Kit Kat loses its 16-year battle to trademark a four-fingered wafer bar at top EU court https://t.co/CI8XIU4wxz— BBC Breaking News (@BBCBreaking) July 25, 2018
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHA
HAHAHA
HAHA
HA
Saturday, June 3, 2017
Famous Cases In The Music Industry...
Led Zeppelin - yeah, the mighty LED ZEP itself -
allegedly stole the intro to their fabled
Stairway To Heaven... HEAVEN...
from this track: SPIRIT by Taurus!
''LITIGATION!''
(why do I feel like singing it to the tune of SABOTAGE now...?)
(NOOOOO - must... resist... urge to!
It's another lawsuit waiting to happen!!!)
Even one of my all-time faves - Men At Work -
stood accused of plagiarism (not merely influence, no)
for their time-honored classic DOWN UNDER!
OTHER FAMOUS CASES:
THE LINES... ARE BLURRED ALRIGHT!
OH NO - NOT KATY TOO!
COWBOY BEBOP...?
UPDATE - FROM THE FUTURE: GAGA TOO!!!
THE CASE OF A CREEP VERSUS A CREEPETTE
... THAT IS THE QUESTION!
...AND KATY LOST!
*CRY* *SNIFFLE* *CRY*
INNOCENT OR GUILTY... YUP -
that is the question!
Mark and BRUNO are serial offenders - ALLEGEDLY...
now this one is just one of those for DEFAMATION cases...
NO BIGGIE! (Another update, incidentally -
from the far-flung, very chaotic - heck, it's
getting to be cauchemardesque around here -
FUTURE...!!!)
Sue me - willya?
Monday, June 6, 2016
SUE *THEM* - SOMEBODY!
YEAH!
SOMEBODY SHOULD SUE THESE PEEPS
- A.S.A.P.
SUE THAT A$$ - FOR BEING TOO SHAPELY!
SUE THIS ONE ALREADY - FOR BLASPHEMY!!!
SAME FOR THIS ONE!!!
SUE THESE GUYS FOR
MISREPRESENTATION
FALSIFICATION
AND OUTRIGHT IGNORANCE!!!
SUE THE MORONS WHO WILL
TRY AND MERCHANDISE
ANYTHING... ANYONE... AT ANY GIVEN TIME!!!
JUST DO IT!
JUSTICE CAN STILL BE SERVED!
Saturday, March 14, 2015
Well... SOMEBODY Wants To Sue... Taber?!?
It's not Taber's Truths now - is it? Cannot be!!!
Of course, it is not T T ...!
Some surprisingly conservative turn
(even for Canada)
on the part of legislators up north
has placed the town of
Taber, Alberta, Canada
on the map, all of a sudden...
And that has subsequently led the kids there
to call upon good ol' Kevin Bacon -of all people-
to save their... ah... bacon?
As if Kev was some sort of Obi-Wan of profanity...!
The situation in Taber mirrors quite strangely
the retrograde climate that made up the entire scenario
of that unlikely sleeper hit flick, Footloose, it is true...
But to imagine that an over-the-hill actor
can help in any way...
Is it a worthy cause, anyway?
''Defend the right to swear in public'' - eh?
No - it is not necessary!
For it is not a question of free speech at all:
more like a question of decency!
It should be obvious to all media
wasting time reporting this trivial bit of news
(as it is to me who is blogging about it!)
And not Bacon nor all the twists and turns
his (pedi?) degrees can take
will help those pesky brats up north now...!
THE CURFEW IS ON!
Sunday, February 1, 2015
Should Have Sued... Sinatra!!!
(Or was it the ''bored''?
For, I wonder still,
which ''board'' was it,
exactly...?)
Wasn't he always, like, taunting and goading us into doing just that anyway: "it's UP to YOU" he said - aaall the time - rrrrrright?!?
Aye, suing Frank for a variety of things would have been just the right thing to do alright: what, with the possible millions it would have raked in, what wonders we could have done with that, hmm?
Aye, suing Frank for a variety of things would have been just the right thing to do alright: what, with the possible millions it would have raked in, what wonders we could have done with that, hmm?
Suing him for having wrought upon the world song after song that was only, in truth, but humming, rambling and mumbling, not singing. Suing him for this very song right here: about a town that is nothing more than a crime-infested rotten-to-the-core ''APPLE'' - the kind you really do NOT want to sink your teeth into - EVER. And he sang of it as if it was the greatest place to be on God's Green Earth - HA!!!
Suing him for having begotten Jr. there... (then again, we are much obliged for Ol' Blue Eyes having given us Nancy - though she waited far too long to do that Playboy spread there...! We love MILFs and GILFs but... Geez! There's a limit, woman! Some decency - please! At your age... Why couldn't you have succumbed and done it when you were sipping that Summer Wine instead - HUH? NOW... Sheesh! Leave it to our imagination and for your bedroom - and whoever you're sharing it with! But that's another story - not necessarily to sue for...!)
Suing him for having begotten Jr. there... (then again, we are much obliged for Ol' Blue Eyes having given us Nancy - though she waited far too long to do that Playboy spread there...! We love MILFs and GILFs but... Geez! There's a limit, woman! Some decency - please! At your age... Why couldn't you have succumbed and done it when you were sipping that Summer Wine instead - HUH? NOW... Sheesh! Leave it to our imagination and for your bedroom - and whoever you're sharing it with! But that's another story - not necessarily to sue for...!)
Finally, we should have sued Frank for those Rat Pack shenanigans, what he did to Peter Lawford afterwards and that insufferable arrogance of his... But his mob buds would have prevented us from suing, so...
Sunday, January 25, 2015
Monday, January 19, 2015
I should have sued...
...this guy!
Luciano vs Лучано
for the sweet tooth,
the dough
and
-most of all-
HONOR!
Monday, January 5, 2015
Special - EN FRANÇAIS?!?
Ou serait-ce en joual, véritablement...?
Um especial em Português vai seguir proximamente;
Um especial em Português vai seguir proximamente;
vocés vão ver que vocés vão gostar!
E, depois, vai ser qualquer coisa em български...
Deutsch... Italiano... Español...
E, depois, vai ser qualquer coisa em български...
Deutsch... Italiano... Español...
Il y a de ces soi-disantes ''chroniques'' des fois qui, au lieu d'accomplir leur mission somme toute assez simple qui est de divertir, nous font avaler les rôties du matin de travers et cracher le café tiède tout aussi vite que la tentative de l'avaler a été faite. Parmi ces soi-disantes ''chroniques'' donc, il y en a une qui mérite la palme dès le début de la nouvelle année: et j'ai nommé la première de 2015 du dénommé Ben (Benoît, vraiment - il veut juste s'américaniser; il rêve du marché lucratif États-Unien. Rêve, mon Ben, rêve - ça coûte rien; mais ça ne donne rien de concret, non plus.)
C'est qui ce ''Ben Chose'' qui se permet de décourager tous les honnêtes gens qui pratiquent un métier dur, honorable, nécessaire (contrairement, euh, au sien, par exemple!) - bref, un métier véritablement utile et foncièrement bénéfique à tous et chacun? C'est qui, ''Ben Chose'' pour oser ''descendre'', donc, avec son opinion infecte, les employés des centres d'appel qui sont pognés (comme il dirait, lui - ou comme il l'écrirait tout aussi bien) pour répondre aux 1001 questions des gens indignés par le service inadéquat pour lequel ils paient souvent bien trop cher? C'est QUI, ''Ben Chose'' donc, pour qualifier la ''job'' essentielle de préposé à l'entretien ménager dans un centre hospitalier de si indigeste, pour ''meussieur'' que, du temps où il était tenu de s'en acquitter deux fois par mois (ou quelque chose du genre) il ratait un jour sur deux et il ''décrocha'' complètement de l'emploi en question dès qu'il le pût - parce que ''meussieur'' n'en voyait pas l'attrait; parce que cela ne le stimulait pas assez afin qu'il se rende au travail et aide au bon fonctionnement d'un système assez chaotique comme ça sans que le gars chargé d'en nettoyer les résidus humains deux fois par mois ne se pointe carrément pas la moitié du temps...! C'est à en croire que ''Ben Chose'' ne lésine point sur l'entretien des ses chaussures, à tout le moins, vu qu'il doit piètiner dans la merde presque tout le temps, faute de personnel assez stimulé pour déblayer le passage devant ''meussieur''...
C'est pas peu dire: si vous lisez l'opinion de Ben Chose et la suivez à la lettre, en 2015, vous lâcherez tous vos ''jobs'' vitales mais de petite envergure -puisque si peu stimulantes- et vous deviendrez tous alors, peut être, des humoristes de petite envergure comme lui, à qui on pourrait donné -à l'occasion, momentanément- un forum sur lequel vous pourrez partager toutes les âneries qui vous passent par la tête, question de faire perdre leur temps à tous ces individus qui font du ''sur place'' avec leur ''p'tites jobbines'' chiantes. Mais, sais-tu quoi, Ben Chose, et savez-vous quoi, petites gens? Vos rôles dans la société sont des rôles-clés; sans le gars ou la fille qui prend en note les plaintes émises très souvent de façon brutale par les clients frustrés, les grosses compagnies ne prendraient compte d'absolument rien, si ce n'est que de collecter leur dû mensuellement. Sans les préposés sanitaires, la société en général serait mille fois plus merdique aussi qu'elle ne l'est d'ores et déjà - dans le sens figuré comme dans le sens propre (ou bien en deça de propre, en fait!)
Tout ça alors que, Ben Chose, avec ses chroniques merdiques et son opinion passe-partout (qui ferait rougir de honte Marie Eykel, si nous étions encore en 1985) ne fera jamais aucune espèce de différence chez son auditoire bien réduit, dans son petit monde bien à lui. À moins qu'il n'y en ait plusieurs qui le suive, son conseil insensé, et qu'ils désertent leurs postes et rôles-clés, donc, pour faire quelque chose de bien moins vital en ce qui a trait au bon fonctionnement de notre société. Car, bien évidemment, Ben Chose se fait le porte-parole bien aguerri de la génération des revendicateurs à qui l'on doit tout mais qui ne doivent rien à personne: les affranchis du monde, la génération Z. (Oui, ça, on veut bien y croire: que ce serait la dernière...! Mais, ça, c'est une autre histoire!)
Ils ne savent pas la signification du mot ''sacrifice'' ces Ben Choses: ils ne connaissant point le sentiment de donner de son temps, de se plier à certains désagréments, pour le plus grand bien commun autant que pour un cheminement personnel des plus édifiants... Non, connais pas!
Certes, tout le monde aime rire: mais si tout le monde voudrait être un bon-à-rien clownesque en lieu et place de quelque chose de bien plus utile à la vie de tous les jours, où irait donc la société actuelle, déjà bien assez désaxée par moments comme ça...? Demandez pas la réponse à ''Ben Chose'' - il vous répondrait n'importe quoi comme il le fait couramment dans toutes et chacune de ses soi-disantes ''chroniques'' tout comme celle-ci, la toute dernière pondue à la hâte, sans aucun doute...
C'est qui ce ''Ben Chose'' qui se permet de décourager tous les honnêtes gens qui pratiquent un métier dur, honorable, nécessaire (contrairement, euh, au sien, par exemple!) - bref, un métier véritablement utile et foncièrement bénéfique à tous et chacun? C'est qui, ''Ben Chose'' pour oser ''descendre'', donc, avec son opinion infecte, les employés des centres d'appel qui sont pognés (comme il dirait, lui - ou comme il l'écrirait tout aussi bien) pour répondre aux 1001 questions des gens indignés par le service inadéquat pour lequel ils paient souvent bien trop cher? C'est QUI, ''Ben Chose'' donc, pour qualifier la ''job'' essentielle de préposé à l'entretien ménager dans un centre hospitalier de si indigeste, pour ''meussieur'' que, du temps où il était tenu de s'en acquitter deux fois par mois (ou quelque chose du genre) il ratait un jour sur deux et il ''décrocha'' complètement de l'emploi en question dès qu'il le pût - parce que ''meussieur'' n'en voyait pas l'attrait; parce que cela ne le stimulait pas assez afin qu'il se rende au travail et aide au bon fonctionnement d'un système assez chaotique comme ça sans que le gars chargé d'en nettoyer les résidus humains deux fois par mois ne se pointe carrément pas la moitié du temps...! C'est à en croire que ''Ben Chose'' ne lésine point sur l'entretien des ses chaussures, à tout le moins, vu qu'il doit piètiner dans la merde presque tout le temps, faute de personnel assez stimulé pour déblayer le passage devant ''meussieur''...
C'est pas peu dire: si vous lisez l'opinion de Ben Chose et la suivez à la lettre, en 2015, vous lâcherez tous vos ''jobs'' vitales mais de petite envergure -puisque si peu stimulantes- et vous deviendrez tous alors, peut être, des humoristes de petite envergure comme lui, à qui on pourrait donné -à l'occasion, momentanément- un forum sur lequel vous pourrez partager toutes les âneries qui vous passent par la tête, question de faire perdre leur temps à tous ces individus qui font du ''sur place'' avec leur ''p'tites jobbines'' chiantes. Mais, sais-tu quoi, Ben Chose, et savez-vous quoi, petites gens? Vos rôles dans la société sont des rôles-clés; sans le gars ou la fille qui prend en note les plaintes émises très souvent de façon brutale par les clients frustrés, les grosses compagnies ne prendraient compte d'absolument rien, si ce n'est que de collecter leur dû mensuellement. Sans les préposés sanitaires, la société en général serait mille fois plus merdique aussi qu'elle ne l'est d'ores et déjà - dans le sens figuré comme dans le sens propre (ou bien en deça de propre, en fait!)
Tout ça alors que, Ben Chose, avec ses chroniques merdiques et son opinion passe-partout (qui ferait rougir de honte Marie Eykel, si nous étions encore en 1985) ne fera jamais aucune espèce de différence chez son auditoire bien réduit, dans son petit monde bien à lui. À moins qu'il n'y en ait plusieurs qui le suive, son conseil insensé, et qu'ils désertent leurs postes et rôles-clés, donc, pour faire quelque chose de bien moins vital en ce qui a trait au bon fonctionnement de notre société. Car, bien évidemment, Ben Chose se fait le porte-parole bien aguerri de la génération des revendicateurs à qui l'on doit tout mais qui ne doivent rien à personne: les affranchis du monde, la génération Z. (Oui, ça, on veut bien y croire: que ce serait la dernière...! Mais, ça, c'est une autre histoire!)
Ils ne savent pas la signification du mot ''sacrifice'' ces Ben Choses: ils ne connaissant point le sentiment de donner de son temps, de se plier à certains désagréments, pour le plus grand bien commun autant que pour un cheminement personnel des plus édifiants... Non, connais pas!
Certes, tout le monde aime rire: mais si tout le monde voudrait être un bon-à-rien clownesque en lieu et place de quelque chose de bien plus utile à la vie de tous les jours, où irait donc la société actuelle, déjà bien assez désaxée par moments comme ça...? Demandez pas la réponse à ''Ben Chose'' - il vous répondrait n'importe quoi comme il le fait couramment dans toutes et chacune de ses soi-disantes ''chroniques'' tout comme celle-ci, la toute dernière pondue à la hâte, sans aucun doute...
Non, Ben Chose: on ne peut pas tous faire ce que l'on aime,
dans la vie - et même Claude Dubois le sait, ça...
''...qu'est-ce que tu veux, mon vieux,
dans la vie on fait ce qu'on peut;
pas ce qu'on veut.''
+++
Sunday, May 11, 2014
I should sue...
A WHOLE LOT OF ASSHOLES!
Like the morons who thought it made sense
to change a whole lot of two-way streets
(which have been this way for years - years!)
into one-way streets... like, overnight!?
Well, it sure as hell felt like it was overnight to ME;
what am I supposed to do here - keep a breast of all
that those lousy, good-for-nothing elected officials
are planning as totally unnecessary changes
to the urban landscape that I have known that way
and am still getting used to - that way -
while I am toiling hard here so hard yeah
for every last virtual penny that is coming
my way - or towards the trusty ol' bank account...!
I swear ya, I swear ya...
I'm feeling like David Wilcox here!
to change a whole lot of two-way streets
(which have been this way for years - years!)
into one-way streets... like, overnight!?
Well, it sure as hell felt like it was overnight to ME;
what am I supposed to do here - keep a breast of all
that those lousy, good-for-nothing elected officials
are planning as totally unnecessary changes
to the urban landscape that I have known that way
and am still getting used to - that way -
while I am toiling hard here so hard yeah
for every last virtual penny that is coming
my way - or towards the trusty ol' bank account...!
I swear ya, I swear ya...
I'm feeling like David Wilcox here!
Or -outright- like Rodney.
Okay - sue the YouTube uploader there;
we want more than just the catch phrase here!
And we shall have it:
... which brings us to the next
(sore) subject/category of
morons to sue...
Anyone who ever disrespected ME -
yeah you... blabbermouth JERK!
You know who you are...!
Or, rather, you only think that you do...
You dared to make fun of me... eh?
You laughed at me...
actually made fun of me!?
HUH?
Well look at you now...
A has-been... still a wannabee...
Or worse still: an ever-so ephemeral,
blink-and-you-miss-it
flash-in-the-pan
USED-TO-BE
FOR ALL OF TWO SECONDS
IN THE GRAND SCHEME OF THINGS!
Bet you don't even know
how to surf the web
in order to find THIS...!!!
which is GOOD, actually - see;
that way, I have quite exactly zero chances of getting SUED
(which would be quite the travesty of justice
and revolting turn of events as it is...!!!)
as I purposefully leave out your names...
since I am doing it, you see, MY WAY...!
Alas all this is still too damn close to the way I do it
on my other blog; y'know... the LAMBASTING one!
I am not about to leave me wide open to get sued
by jerks/bastards/morons/nincompoops/neanderthals
that have slighted me in the past - on top of that!!!
We wanna get litigious?
We do it the luminous way: we sue!
We don't get sued!!!
Although I am reticent to give any wad of cash
to just about any pettifogger whatsoever -
in order to get going there...
But I digress...
Sunday, October 13, 2013
I should sue...
THE 13!
Now to select which
thirteen that truly is...
Reasons to sue vary wildly
-there are, at least, thirteen-
and whether "we got a case"
(or thirteen cases - yeah)
is not for sure at all...
Just be glad I picked
a Sunday the 13th
(not Friday the 13th)
to, ah, explore the possibilities
and opportunities... here!
You never want to say
"I should have sued"
after all... eh?
Friday, September 13, 2013
I should sue...
SUPERSTITION!
See - it causes all sorts of mischief
AND
it begat... all of the following:
I'll take the 13th...
it's for a gift!
Friday, August 2, 2013
We Should Sue... Peggy Sue!
...for having failed so badly to truly live up
to the great legacy... of Buddy!
Buddy Holly wouldn't have sued - I know.
Can't believe Peggy Lee never did though!
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Let's Sue... The Dirty Dozen!
We HATE the army, y'know...
... not all that fond of workouts either...
... THIS GUY alone deserves to be sued -
for setting such a caloric-rich BAD example
- for breakfast!!!
... SEE???
Let's sue the Brass Band too, while we're at it -
they're making too much noise!!!
And the dozen clones (... DC's...!!!)
from Seattle, too...!!!
That should be enough work for 12
pettifoggers from any dime-a-dozen law firm
out there...!!!
Yup!
Thursday, January 19, 2012
Sue YT - For Libel!
What could possibly be more compromising than having one of these videos amidst your perfectly lyrical, musical playlist courtesy of YouTube?
I mean - I don't know what is truly worse: this or that!
(And never mind when they do this to you!)
It just boggles the psyche - er, mind, that is - that they would put such messages in place, as if to incriminate the uploader AND viewers of whatever videos it may be...!
Granted - if you uploaded compromising pictures of yourself like, I don't know, say Tony of NY did, that would take the cake
I swear to you, those square-faced "sorry smileys" with their "embarrassed/we messed up" goofy look all over their smirks - I can't stand them anymore!!!
Having one of those show up is not only annoying and embarrassing indeed - it is a case of libel, I tell you. Because having these videos removed makes it seem that they were considerably worse than they are in truth - and it reflects terribly bad on you for having had them, once upon a time, as a part of your precious playlist!
I mean, the YT message clearly states that they took down the video because of their (self-sanctimonious) policy regarding nudity and/or sexual content - whoa! Peeps see this was part of your playlist, a perfectly innocent playlist (as it is lyrical, musical - fantasmagorical) and they will imagine the worst imagery possible, being unable to actually view the video any longer in order to actually judge for themselves what it really was all about, due to the simple fact that YouTube took it down already!
So, this looks bad - on you! - not on YouTube! (Even YouTube's flaws show up crystal and painfully clear here, as such reprehensible material was allowed to be uploaded onto their site in the first place - but that will be overlooked by the common viewer in five seconds flat, I tell ya!)
YouTube is thus an accessory to making people look down on you, label you a "perv" or some other really detrimental and derogatory thing - and that should make YT accountable for something... right?!?
Just saying...!
;-)
I mean - I don't know what is truly worse: this or that!
(And never mind when they do this to you!)
It just boggles the psyche - er, mind, that is - that they would put such messages in place, as if to incriminate the uploader AND viewers of whatever videos it may be...!
Granted - if you uploaded compromising pictures of yourself like, I don't know, say Tony of NY did, that would take the cake
I swear to you, those square-faced "sorry smileys" with their "embarrassed/we messed up" goofy look all over their smirks - I can't stand them anymore!!!
Having one of those show up is not only annoying and embarrassing indeed - it is a case of libel, I tell you. Because having these videos removed makes it seem that they were considerably worse than they are in truth - and it reflects terribly bad on you for having had them, once upon a time, as a part of your precious playlist!
I mean, the YT message clearly states that they took down the video because of their (self-sanctimonious) policy regarding nudity and/or sexual content - whoa! Peeps see this was part of your playlist, a perfectly innocent playlist (as it is lyrical, musical - fantasmagorical) and they will imagine the worst imagery possible, being unable to actually view the video any longer in order to actually judge for themselves what it really was all about, due to the simple fact that YouTube took it down already!
So, this looks bad - on you! - not on YouTube! (Even YouTube's flaws show up crystal and painfully clear here, as such reprehensible material was allowed to be uploaded onto their site in the first place - but that will be overlooked by the common viewer in five seconds flat, I tell ya!)
YouTube is thus an accessory to making people look down on you, label you a "perv" or some other really detrimental and derogatory thing - and that should make YT accountable for something... right?!?
Just saying...!
;-)
Sunday, December 25, 2011
Saturday, September 10, 2011
9/11 - 24 Hours Before The Anniversary
The case opposing those who believe that Al Qaeda did it
and the ``truthers`` (who can`t handle the truth)
- those who chose to believe that
it was dumbasses like Dubya
Cheney and Rumsfeld
that orchestrated
the whole tragedy -
is a case
that will never be solved,
surely.
In court
Out of court
Or whatever. wherever and whenever.
What does it matter though
``who did it`` exactly?
Ten years later,
Osama Bin Laden is dead.
Numerous other Al Qaeda members
have likewise bitten the dust.
Many more innocents have, too.
The only important thing, really
is that it happened.
And the world
will never be the same again.
Sunday, October 10, 2010
I... no, W(w)E should sue...
Ric Flair!
For *not* retiring!
At 61 years of age...!
_flair_wooo.jpg)
While his heir apparent and nearest true rival, the one who had apparently retired *him* by defeating Ric in a so-called retirement match, HAS RETIRED... at 40-something!!!
Of course, Ric has retired and unretired four or five times already in the last three decades - so doing this is not at all unlike him.
One guesses that, after being such a big spender with (is it four) previous wives, he still has a *Fourtune* to build... or rebuild.
It is he who should have sued, probably...!
Oh well...
Wooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
:!
Flair should have sued Turner!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
_flair_wooo.jpg)
